The six ministers
Knox writes that “Commission and charge was given to Mr John Winram, Subprior of St Andrews, Master John Spottiswood, John Willock, Mr John Douglas, Rector of St Andrews, Master John Row, and John Knox, to draw in a volume the Policy and Discipline of the Kirk, as well as they had done the Doctrine; which they did and presented to the Nobility, who did peruse it many days” [spelling modernised].1
Calderwood and MacPherson name the same six. MacPherson: “Six ministers were appointed to prepare a Book of Church Order — John Knox, John Wynram, John Spottiswoode, John Willock, John Douglas, and John Row.” Cunningham leaves out Douglas, and M’Crie’s Life of Knox leaves out Willock.2
When it was written
The Book’s own preface, addressed “To the Great Council of Scotland now admitted to the Regiment [government]” [spelling modernised], says that its authors “received a charge, dated at Edinburgh, 29 April, in the year of God 1560” [spelling modernised], to set down in a book their judgement “touching the Reformation of Religion” [spelling modernised]; and it closes, “From Edinburgh, the 20 of May 1560” [spelling modernised].3
Knox’s own narrative, however, places the commission after the Parliament of August 1560, as do Calderwood and Cunningham. M’Crie noticed the difference: the printed copies give 29 April and 20 May, “But, as the civil war was not then concluded, I have followed the account given by Knox, who says, that it was undertaken subsequently to the meeting of parliament in August that year.”4
What it set out
Its first head, “Of Doctrine”, begins: “Seeing that Christ Jesus is he whom God the Father has commanded only to be heard, and followed of his sheep, we urge it necessary that his Evangel [Gospel] be truly and openly preached in every Kirk and Assembly of this Realm” [spelling modernised].5
Of the sacraments it says “they be two, to wit, Baptism, and the Holy Supper of the Lord Jesus” [spelling modernised].6
Ministers were to be called by their people: “It appertains to the People, and to every several [separate] Congregation, to Elect their Minister” [spelling modernised]. If a congregation was negligent “the space of forty days” [spelling modernised], the church of the Superintendent with his Council might present a man to them.7
Where no minister could yet be had, “must be appointed the most apt men, that distinctly can read the Common Prayers and the Scriptures” [spelling modernised]: the readers. No one under twenty-one was to be admitted a reader.8
Every minister was to have at least “forty bolls [measures] meal, and twenty-six bolls malt, to find [provide] his house bread and drink” [spelling modernised].9
“Every several [separate] Kirk must provide for the poor within itself.” [spelling modernised] “We are not patrons for stubborn and idle beggars,” [spelling modernised] it says, but “for the widow and fatherless, the aged, impotent or lamed, who neither can nor may travail [labour] for their sustentation [support], we say that God commands his people to be careful” [spelling modernised].10
To plant and erect churches, ten or twelve superintendents were to be chosen, “for in so many Provinces have we divided the whole” [spelling modernised]. They “must be preachers themselves” [spelling modernised], must stay no more than twenty or thirty days in one place on their visitation, and must examine “the life, diligence, and behaviour of the Ministers” [spelling modernised], how the poor are provided for and how the youth are instructed. A superintendent was himself “subjected to the censure and correction of the Ministers and Elders” [spelling modernised] of his province. The Book names ten provinces, with the superintendent’s seat in each:11
- Orkney, Shetland, Caithness and Strathnaver: Kirkwall
- Ross, Sutherland, Moray, Skye and Lewis: the Chanonry [cathedral town] of Ross
- Argyll, Kintyre, Lorne, the South Isles, Arran, Bute and Lochaber: Argyll
- Between Dee and Spey: Old Aberdeen
- The Mearns and Angus, and the Brae of Mar to Dee: Brechin
- Fife and Fotheringham to Stirling, and the shire of Perth: St Andrews
- Lothian, and Stirling south of the Forth, with the Merse, Lauderdale and Weddell: Edinburgh
- Teviotdale, Tweeddale, Liddesdale and Ettrick Forest: Jedburgh
- Clydesdale, Renfrew, Menteith, Lennox, Kyle and Cunningham: Glasgow
- Galloway, Carrick, Nithsdale and Annandale: Dumfries
Every church was to have a schoolmaster, “able, at least, to teach Grammar and the Latin tongue, if the Town be of any reputation” [spelling modernised]. In the country the reader or minister was to “take care over the children and youth of the parish, to instruct them in their first rudiments, and especially in the Catechism” [spelling modernised]. The universities were to be three: “The first in St Andrews, the second in Glasgow, and the third in Aberdeen” [spelling modernised].12
Of church discipline it says: “To Discipline must all Estates within this Realm be subject, if they offend, as well the Rulers as they that are ruled; yea and the Preachers themselves” [spelling modernised].13
Elders were to be chosen yearly from “Men of best knowledge in God’s word, of cleanest life, men faithful, and of most honest conversation that can be found in the Church” [spelling modernised], “to assist the Minister in all public affairs of the Church” [spelling modernised]. Deacons were “to receive the rents, and gather the alms of the Church, to keep and distribute the same” [spelling modernised]. Neither was to have a stipend, “because their travail [labour] continues but for one year” [spelling modernised].14
Subscribed
Not all the nobles welcomed it. Knox writes: “Some approved it, and willed the same to have been set forth by a law. Others, perceiving their carnal liberty and worldly commodity [advantage] somewhat to be impaired thereby, grudged” [spelling modernised], and mocked it as “devout imaginations” [spelling modernised]. The chief of those who refused to subscribe was Lord Erskine.15
A convention of the nobility was appointed to meet at Edinburgh on 15 January 1561, and Calderwood writes that “At the same convention, the Book of Discipline was subscribed” [spelling modernised].16
Knox writes that the Book “was subscribed by a great part of the Nobility” [spelling modernised], who “subscribed and approved the said Book of Discipline, in the Tolbooth of Edinburgh, the twenty-seventh day of January, the year of God 1560” [spelling modernised]. The year then began on 25 March, so this is January 1561 by the modern reckoning, as Calderwood says: “the 27th day of Januarie, in the yeere of our Lord 1561, according to the new accompt [reckoning]”. The Book’s own form of approbation is headed “Act of Secret Council, 27 January” [spelling modernised]. Cunningham and Hetherington give 17 January, and M’Crie reports a copy dated 25 January.17
Among those Knox names as subscribing (identifications from Laing’s notes):18
- “the Duke’s Grace” [spelling modernised] (the Duke of Châtelherault) and the Earl of Arran
- the Earls of Argyll, Glencairn, Marischal, Menteith, Morton and Rothes
- Lord James Stewart, later Earl of Moray
- the Lords Yester, Boyd and Ochiltree; the Master of Maxwell; Lord Lindsay the elder and the Master of Lindsay
- the lairds of Drumlanrig, Lochinvar, Garlies and Bargany
- Alexander Gordon, Bishop of Galloway, and Alexander Campbell, Dean of Moray
- “with a great number more” [spelling modernised]
They declared it “good, and conform to God’s Word in all points” [spelling modernised], and promised to “set the same forward at the uttermost of our powers” [spelling modernised], provided that the bishops, abbots, priors and other prelates who had joined them should keep “the revenues of their benefices during their lifetimes, they sustaining and upholding the Ministry and Ministers … for preaching of the Word, and ministering of the Sacraments of God” [spelling modernised].19
Later in 1561 Knox records that “The Preachers vehemently exhorted us to establish The Book of Discipline, by an Act and public Law; affirming that if they suffered things to hang in suspense, when God had given unto them sufficient power in their hands, they should after sob for it, but should not get it” [spelling modernised].20
The General Assembly’s register first names the Book at Edinburgh on 26 May 1561, when it asked that the stipends “contained in the Book of Discipline for sustentation of the ministers” [spelling modernised] be secured.21
See also
Notes
- John Knox, The History of the Reformation in Scotland, ed. David Laing, vol. 2, in The Works of John Knox, vol. 2 (Edinburgh: Wodrow Society, 1848), p. 128: “Commissioun and charge was gevin to Mr. Johne Winram Suppriour of Sanctandrois, Maister Johne Spottiswoode, Johne Willok, Mr. John Douglas Rectour of Sanctandrois, Maister Johne Row, and Johne Knox, to draw in a volume the Polecey and Disciplyn of the Kirk, as weill as thei had done the Doctrin; whiche thei did and presented to the Nobilitie, who did peruse it many dayis” (OCR). ↑
- David Calderwood, The History of the Kirk of Scotland, ed. Thomas Thomson, vol. 2 (Edinburgh: Wodrow Society, 1843), p. 41 (OCR); John MacPherson, A History of the Church in Scotland (Paisley: Alexander Gardner, 1901), p. 112 (OCR); Dissenting: John Cunningham, The Church History of Scotland, 2nd edn, 2 vols (Edinburgh: James Thin, 1882), vol. 1, p. 281, five names, without Douglas (OCR); Dissenting: Thomas M'Crie, Life of John Knox (Philadelphia: Presbyterian Board of Publication, n.d.), p. 209, note, five names, without Willock (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, pp. 183–184, 257: “To the Great Counsall of Scotland now admitted to [the] Regiment … Frome youre Honouris we receaved a charge, daittit at Edinburgh, xxix of Aprile, in the yeir of God Jm Vc thre scoir yeiris … oure jugementis tuiching the Reformatioun of Religioun … Frome Edinburgh, The 20 of Maij 1560” (OCR); MacPherson, History, p. 112 (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, p. 128 (OCR); Calderwood, History, vol. 2, p. 41 (OCR); Cunningham, Church History, vol. 1, p. 281 (OCR); M'Crie, Life of Knox, p. 210, note (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, p. 185: “Seeing that Christ Jesus is he quhom God the Father hes commandit onlie to be herd, and followed of his scheip, we urge it necessarie, that his Evangell be trewlie and openlie preached in everie Kirk and Assemblie of this Realme” (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, p. 186: “thai be two, to wit, Baptisme, and the Holie Supper of the Lord Jesus” (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, p. 189: “It apperteneth to the Pepill, and to everie severall Congregatioun, to Elect thair Minister: And in caise that thai be fundin negligent thairin the space of fourty dayis” (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, pp. 195–196, 200: “To the Kirkis quhair no ministeris can be haid presentlie, must be appointed the most apt men, that distinctlie can read the Commoune Prayeris and the Scripturis” (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, p. 198: “everie Minister sall have at leist fourtie bollis meill, and twenty-six bollis malt, to find his house breid and drink” (OCR); M'Crie, Life of Knox, pp. 213–214 (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, p. 200: “Every severall Kirk must provide for the poore within the self … We ar nott patronis for stubburne and idill beggaris … but for the wedow and fatherless, the aiged, impotent, or laymed, quho neather can nor may travell for thair sustentatioun, we say, that God commandeth his pepill to be cairfull” (OCR); MacPherson, History, pp. 112–113 (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, pp. 202–207: “for in sa mony Provincis have we divideit the hoill … thei must be preachearis thame selves … examyn the life, diligence, and behaviour of the Ministeris … must be subjected to the censur and correctioun of the Ministeris and Elderis” (OCR); MacPherson, History, p. 113 (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, pp. 209–210, 213: “everie severall Churche have a Scholmaister appointed, suche a one as is able, at least, to teache Grammer and the Latine toung, yf the Toun be of any reputatioun … take cayre over the children and youth of the parische, to instruct them in thair first rudimentis, and especiallie in the Catechisme … The first in Sanctandrois, the secound in Glasgow, and the thrid in Abirdene” (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, p. 233: “To Discipline must all Estaitis within this Realme be subject, yf thay offend, alsweil the Reullaris as thay that are reulit; yea and the Preachearis thame selfis” (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, pp. 233–237: “Men of best knawledge in Goddis word, of cleanest life, men faithfull, and of most honest conversatioun that can be fund in the Churche … to assist the Minister in all publict effares of the Churche … to receave the rentis, and gadder the almous of the Churche, to keip and distribute the same … becaus thair travell contineuis bot for ane yeare” (OCR); Cunningham, Church History, vol. 1, p. 284 (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, p. 128: “Some approved it, and willed the samyn have bene sett furth be a law. Otheris, perceaving thair carnall libertie and worldlie commoditie somewhat to be impaired thairby grudged … “devote imaginationis”” (OCR); Calderwood, History, vol. 2, pp. 41–42 (OCR). ↑
- Calderwood, History, vol. 2, pp. 44, 50: “At the same conventioun, the Booke of Discipline was subscribed” (OCR); Cunningham, Church History, vol. 1, pp. 293–294 (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, pp. 129, 257 and note: “Yitt the same Book of Discipline was subscrived by a great parte of the Nobilitie … subscrived and approved the said Book of Discipline, in the Tolbuyth of Edinburgh, the twenty-sevin day of Januare, the year of God Jm Vc threscoir yearis” (OCR); Calderwood, History, vol. 2, p. 50 (OCR); Dissenting: Cunningham, Church History, vol. 1, p. 292, 17 January 1561 (OCR); Dissenting: W. M. Hetherington, History of the Church of Scotland (New York: Robert Carter & Brothers, 1854), p. 54, 17 January 1561 (OCR); Dissenting: M'Crie, Life of Knox, p. 210, note, “25th January 1560,” from Dunlop’s Collection of Confessions (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, p. 129 (OCR); Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, pp. 258–260, notes (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, pp. 257–258: “thinkis the samin good, and conforme to Goddis Word in all pointis … promittis to sett the samin fordwarte at the uttermost of oure poweris: Providing that the Bischoppis, Abbotis, Priouris, and otheris Prelattis and beneficit men … bruik the reveneues of thair benefices during thair liftymes, thei susteanand and uphaldand the Ministerie and Ministeris … for preaching of the Word, and ministering of the Sacramentis of God” (OCR). ↑
- Knox, History, ed. Laing, vol. 2, p. 181: “The Preachearis vehementlie exhorted us to establische The Buke of Discipline, by ane Act and publict Law; affirmyng, that and gif thay suffered thingis to hing in suspence, quhen God haid gevin unto thame sufficient power in thair handis, thai suld efter sobb for it, bot suld nott get it” (OCR); Calderwood, History, vol. 2, p. 50 (OCR). ↑
- Booke of the Universall Kirk, vol. 1, p. 8: “that no letters take place whill the stipends contained in the Booke of Discipline for sustentation of the ministers, be first consignit”. ↑
Sources
- Acts and Proceedings of the General Assemblies of the Kirk of Scotland, from the Year M.D.LX. [the Booke of the Universall Kirk], vol. 1 (Edinburgh: Bannatyne Club, 1839).
- David Calderwood, The History of the Kirk of Scotland, ed. Thomas Thomson, vol. 2 (Edinburgh: Wodrow Society, 1843) (OCR).
- John Cunningham, The Church History of Scotland, 2nd edn, 2 vols (Edinburgh: James Thin, 1882) (OCR).
- W. M. Hetherington, History of the Church of Scotland (New York: Robert Carter & Brothers, 1854) (OCR).
- John Knox, The History of the Reformation in Scotland, ed. David Laing, vol. 2, in The Works of John Knox, vol. 2 (Edinburgh: Wodrow Society, 1848) (OCR).
- Thomas M'Crie, Life of John Knox (Philadelphia: Presbyterian Board of Publication, n.d.) (OCR).
- John MacPherson, A History of the Church in Scotland (Paisley: Alexander Gardner, 1901) (OCR).